David Lee
2015-12-12 03:58:37 UTC
Hi,
I tried to download some cygwin ports packages using the instructions at
the home page:
http://cygwinports.org/
I tried to download the package named mingw64-i686-sqlite3, so I clicked
that package and it said the version was at 3.8.8-1.
Then I clicked 'next' and it started downloading. However afterwards it
reported 'Download Incomplete. Try again?"
I inspected the ini file(s) from the server:
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/x86/setup.bz2
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/x86/setup.ini
And both said the current version of that package was 3.8.8-1, which was
wrong because the corresponding package didn't exist on the server:
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/noarch/release/mingw64-i686-sqlite3/mingw64-i686-sqlite3-3.8.8-1.tar.xz
It should have been 3.8.11.1-1:
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/noarch/release/mingw64-i686-sqlite3/mingw64-i686-sqlite3-3.8.11.1-1.tar.xz
Can someone check the content of the setup.ini files? this package isn't
the only one that is wrong.
Thanks.
David.
I tried to download some cygwin ports packages using the instructions at
the home page:
http://cygwinports.org/
I tried to download the package named mingw64-i686-sqlite3, so I clicked
that package and it said the version was at 3.8.8-1.
Then I clicked 'next' and it started downloading. However afterwards it
reported 'Download Incomplete. Try again?"
I inspected the ini file(s) from the server:
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/x86/setup.bz2
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/x86/setup.ini
And both said the current version of that package was 3.8.8-1, which was
wrong because the corresponding package didn't exist on the server:
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/noarch/release/mingw64-i686-sqlite3/mingw64-i686-sqlite3-3.8.8-1.tar.xz
It should have been 3.8.11.1-1:
ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/noarch/release/mingw64-i686-sqlite3/mingw64-i686-sqlite3-3.8.11.1-1.tar.xz
Can someone check the content of the setup.ini files? this package isn't
the only one that is wrong.
Thanks.
David.